Only weeks ago, AT&T announced gigabit fiber broadband service in Kansas City for $70/month. Granted, customers have to give up their right to privacy to get that rate, but at least it’s the same price being charged by Google Fiber, which also happens to operate in KC. But when it comes toAT&T’s impending gigabit offering in Cupertino — the land of Apple — that $70/month rate is nowhere to be found; probably because Google Fiber is not around.
Kansas City isn’t the only place where the presence of competition results in a lower price for AT&T’s gigabit service. Customers in Austin can also get service for $70, if they’re willing to opt into the usage monitoring. And guess who else operates in Austin? Google Fiber.
Over in Dallas, AT&T’s home turf, you’ll pay the $110/month rate for AT&T’s highest-speed offering. As you’ve probably guessed, there’s no Google Fiber there.
Okay, so AT&T U-Verse users in Cupertino and Dallas can’t get the $70/month rate, but at least they won’t have to compromise their privacy to save $40/month, right?
Nope, as Ars Technica points out, the $110/month rate in these markets doesn’t give you the option of avoiding the monitoring.
AT&T has not yet announced pricing for other planned markets like Atlanta, Chicago, Nashville, and Charlotte, but we have a hunch those rates will be based on whether or not Google Fiber has staked a claim on the area too, as there are a number of overlaps between the two lists.
Google has already confirmed plans to expand to Charlotte and Raleigh-Durham in North Carolina, Atlanta, and Nashville.
The folks in Cupertino may eventually see a price drop, as Google lists the San Jose market (which would presumably encompass Apple’s hometown) as a “Potential Fiber City.”
This all underscores how vital competition is for consumers. Without a competitor offering comparable high-speed fiber service, AT&T is free to charge $40/month more than it does as soon as a viable competitor enters the picture.
The pay-TV industry — which blossomed into the consumer broadband business just because these companies had lines that could carry the signals — has benefited for decades from near monopolies in most parts of the country, as local franchise agreements gave these businesses exclusive access to area homes and utility poles.