Speeders want $3M back from New Miami's traffic cameras; 40 percent of money collected went to traffic company
The operative number in the New Miami speed camera case has always been $1.8 million, but now the speeders are requesting the village pay more than $3 million.
New Miami’s former speed program was deemed unconstitutional in 2014, when a Butler County judge banned its use and granted the case class-action status, meaning thousands of other motorists who had been cited could join a lawsuit and seek a legal remedy.
The village contracted with Optotraffic to run the previous speed camera program and for that service the Maryland traffic camera people were paid $1.2 million or 40 percent of the total fine collection amount of $3 million.
Now, the speeders’ attorneys have asked a judge to award them the full amount.
“We’re entitled to all the money they collected under this scheme,” attorney Josh Engel said. “The fact that they paid some of this money out to Optotraffic, that’s their cost of doing business and that’s not our problem.”
New Miami’s attorney James Englert, who doesn’t think the speeders have a case, said he doesn’t believe the judge should hold New Miami responsible for fines they never received.
“The value the village is enriched by is $1.8 million — we don’t have the other amount,” he said. “And I don’t think it would be right for the court to hold the village for that other amount. They could have sued Optotraffic for that other amount.”
Engel said they have no intention of suing the former vendor, but New Miami could if they want to recoup the money. Engel said he is also unconcerned about the fact that the village might not have the money to refund the $95 speeding ticket fines to his clients.
He and his partners on the case tried to garnish collections from the new speeding program — as of June 30 the village has collected $162,056 — with no success. But he said since Englert told the judge recently the village has $1.2 million in unencumbered funds and they have the new speed camera revenue stream, the judgment, could be paid.
“They can’t really claim poverty in this thing,” he said. “They can come up with the money.”
A judge previously ruled the administrative hearing process New Miami employed did not offer speeders due process rights. The case has twice gone to the 12th District Court of Appeals. The Ohio Supreme Court has declined to take over the case.